- The AI Underground With CAIS
- Posts
- The AI Learning Curve: Strategic Lessons from Early Failures
The AI Learning Curve: Strategic Lessons from Early Failures
Why does an “agenticOS” paradigm matter, and how does software that writes its own playbook upend today’s click-driven workflows? If messy culture beats perfect code in every rollout, what new leadership behaviors separate winners from the wave-tossed?How will rapidly tightening AI regulations, from the EU’s AI Act to U.S. state patchworks, reshape product roadmaps and compliance budgets over the next two years? What does “governance as a product” look like in practice, and why might late-stage compliance be costlier than the models themselves? Can continuous upskilling truly outpace the speed at which agentic systems learn, or will the talent gap widen into a chasm? Read on for the answer to these questions and much more below!
Ross Green
June 03, 2025
Table of Contents
Introduction:
From hospital wards to grocery aisles, AI is graduating from lab novelty to frontline operator. And it’s happening before our eyes, rapidly!
But as 2025 has gotten into full swing, a new software paradigm, CAIS’ agenticOS, began stitching those point solutions into self-directed systems that perceive, plan, and act with limited human nudges to enhance the work of the human-in-the-loop (check out the definition here). Where yesterday’s apps waited for a click, an agenticOS wakes on signals, negotiates APIs, and loops through its own learn-improve cycles using the cutting edges of NLP, vectorized agenticDatabases, RAG, and MCP. In theory, that means oncological copilots triaging scans before doctors do their rounds, delivery fleets rerouting as storms brew, and marketing stacks spinning up A/B tests while their human counterparts sleep.
Yet hype and reality seldom meet on the first date (or even on subsequent dates). This newsletter, therefore, takes a clear-eyed walk through both sides of the ledger. Section 1.1 tours the moon-shot metrics and board-room buzz now filling pitch decks; Section 1.2 contrasts them with the data quagmires, cultural headwinds, and ROI regrets that surface once prototypes hit production. We then widen the lens in Section 2, mapping the fast-tightening regulatory web, dissecting how AI is rewriting professional identities, and spotlighting the playbooks of teams already thriving amid the churn. Section 3 is an objective look at the issue by the numbers, and finally, we close in Section 4 with a forward-looking brief on why the future favors the prepared, and how sharp strategy plus continuous reinvention can turn every rule-change into runway.
Think of this guide as a framework for founders, operators, and policymakers determined to steer, rather than spectate, as the agentic era accelerates.
Section 1: What We Hoped vs. What Went Wrong
In the mid-2020s, AI was hailed as a universal problem-solver: investors poured billions into “moonshot” pilots, and slide decks promised double-digit growth powered by algorithms alone. Yet 24 months later, many of those same projects are stalled, or quietly sunset, simply because the real world proved messier than demo day or in vitro studies. This section contrasts that early euphoria with the hard-won lessons that followed, showing why dissecting failure is the first step to strategic success.
OpenAI. “What We Hoped vs. What Went Wrong.” DALL·E image created for Ross Green, 28 May 2025. Accessed June 1, 2025.
Section 1.1: The Big Promise: Moonshots, Miracle Metrics, and Boardroom Buzz Picture a boardroom in late-2024: a slick demo reels through 3D tumor scans while an LLM narrates treatment options in flawless bedside manner; the slide that follows promises a 97.3% diagnostic “match rate.” Next up, a grocery-chain pilot boasts self-driving vans…read more here.  Green, R. (2025, June 1). The AI Ship is Asea [Digital illustration]. Generated using OpenAI’s DALL·E. | Section 1.2: The Reality Check: Data Quagmires, Cultural Headwinds, and ROI Regret The moment those glossy prototypes met the messy back end, sh*t fully hit the fan. Data pipelines that looked robust “in vitro” turned out to be “Franken-spreadsheets,” ala author Mary Shelley’s monster, stitched together often by interns. The result, we hate to say, is commonly: duplicated rows, mis-keyed SKUs… …One of my personal favorite quagmires was the U.S. military’s attempt to use AI to detect Russian vs. American tanks, which apparently may not be a real story after all but does point to an important lesson regarding AI…read more here.  Ross W. Green. (Accessed June 1, 2025). “The Oncology Paradigm Example.” Canva.com |
Section 2: Deep Dive: Why the AI Age Is Rewriting Both the Government Rulebook and the Corporate Résumé
From Brussels to boardrooms, 2025 feels less like a software upgrade than a civil-engineering feat; one analogy is that regulators pour concrete around the torrent of generative AI while workers race to span it. This can be overwhelming. As such, the loudest sound now is the handshake between lawmakers, risk officers, and employees rewriting their job descriptions. Ahead, we chart three fronts: (1) the hard boundaries governments are setting, (2) how those rules are reshaping professional identities, and (3) the playbook that lets businesses and talent thrive in the flux.
Ross W. Green, MD (Access June 1, 2025). “Why the AI Age is Rewriting the Playbook.” Canva.com.
Section 2.1: The Regulation Landscape in the EU and U.S. Momentum on the rule-making front is advancing at a pace of a full sprint rather than a competitive race walk. In Europe, the AI Act’s countdown clock is ticking: training-literacy duties and the first set of “prohibited-practice” bans bit on 2 February 2025, and the European AI Office…And in the U.S…read more here.  Ross W. Green, MD (Accessed June 1, 2025). “Achieving Global Regulatory Compliance.” Napkin.ai | Section 2.2: The agenticOS shifting Professional Identities In offices and warehouses alike, the badge “professional” is being re-engraved. In this light, a KPMG census shows 67 % of U.S. workers already lean on AI to lift personal productivity…read more here.  The future of Business. | Section 2.3: Adapting and Thriving with the agenticOS Boards that once treated “AI strategy” as a moon-shot initiative are now treating it as rudimentary as basic plumbing. LinkedIn and the World Economic Forum report that the mix of core job skills is on track to shift by 70% before 2030, and six in ten C-suite leaders believe GenAI …read more here.  Ross W. Green, MD (Accessed June 1, 2025). “Strategies for Winning Firms to Adapt and Thrive with the agenticOS.” Napkin.ai |
Section 3: By the Numbers
Takeaways: Stronger rules are all but inevitable: both the public and executives anticipate tougher AI oversight, so companies should start preparing for compliance now. Workforce anxiety remains high, yet the data suggest AI will augment more jobs than it eliminates, meaning leaders must quell fears through transparency and retraining. Firms that invested in upskilling rather than swift layoffs are already seeing better productivity gains, highlighting that people strategy ultimately drives ROI. Finally, risk management, rather than data quality, is the primary bottleneck to scaling generative-AI projects, so robust governance and ethical safeguards are now the price of admission.
# | Data Point | Implication | Source |
1 | ~60% of Americans (and 56% of AI experts) are more worried the U.S. government will not go far enough in regulating AI than that it will over-regulate. | Strong public concern about insufficient AI oversight signals that business leaders should prepare for stricter regulations and engage proactively with policymakers to ensure responsible AI practices. | Pew Research Center (Apr 3, 2025) |
2 | 30% of workers who use generative AI fear their jobs are at risk, and 27% report “AI-driven imposter syndrome” (feeling their skills may be devalued). | A significant share of employees are anxious about AI-driven job loss and diminished value, indicating that leaders must address workforce fears through transparency, upskilling, and support to maintain morale and retention. | Ivanti 2025 Tech at Work Report (via Reworked, May 27, 2025) |
3 | 39% of companies have already laid off staff due to AI automation – and 55% of those now regret the decision. | Early AI-driven layoffs often backfire: over half of companies that cut workers for AI adoption found it detrimental. This warns leaders to be cautious about replacing people with AI and to thoroughly assess productivity impacts before downsizing. | TechRepublic (Orgvue survey report, May 19, 2025) |
4 | 72% of professionals say they use some form of AI at work (up from 48% in 2024). Meanwhile 56% of firms have adopted AI, with another 32% piloting it (nearly 88% in total planning adoption). | AI tools have rapidly become mainstream in the workplace, roughly doubling user adoption in one year. Business leaders must accelerate AI integration and governance in their organizations, as most competitors are already adopting these tools to boost productivity. | Intapp 2025 Tech Perceptions Survey (May 20, 2025) |
5 | 42% of global business leaders believe AI will augment existing jobs rather than replace them, versus only 15% who expect outright replacement (28% foresee a mix). | Most leaders envision AI as a complement to human workers, not a wholesale replacement. This suggests a strategy of redesigning roles and workflows for human-AI collaboration, focusing on augmentation and retraining rather than massive layoffs. | Gallagher “Attitudes to AI” Survey 2025 |
6 | Nearly 50% of companies are offering training to upskill employees on AI tools, and 34% have already reskilled workers whose roles were displaced by AI. | Many organizations are investing in employee development to cope with AI-driven change. Proactively upskilling and reskilling the workforce will be crucial for leaders to smooth the transition, fill new skill gaps, and retain talent in an AI-enabled business environment. | Gallagher “Attitudes to AI” Survey 2025 |
7 | 82% of executives say that risk management is the biggest challenge in implementing generative AI initiatives (outweighing data quality (64%) or personal trust in AI (35%)). | Leaders recognize that managing AI risks – such as security, ethics, and compliance – is the foremost hurdle to scaling AI. Companies must strengthen AI governance, oversight, and risk mitigation strategies to realize AI’s benefits while avoiding pitfalls. | KPMG Quarterly AI Pulse (Q1 2025) |
8 | By 2030, 44% of workers worldwide will require reskilling or upskilling, and 75% of companies already report a significant skills gap in their workforce. | The demand for new skills is soaring as AI and automation reshape jobs. Business and HR strategists should ramp up continuous learning programs and talent development now, to close current skill gaps and prepare nearly half of their workforce for future skill requirements. | World Economic Forum – Future of Jobs 2025 (Mar 27, 2025) |
Section 4: The Road Ahead
Ross W. Green, MD (Accessed June 1, 2025). “The AI Spaceship.” Canva.com.
As we look to a future shaped by AI, one thing is clear: the future will favor the prepared. For business leaders, this means viewing AI’s disruptive force as a catalyst for…AI industry leaders must be at the table to help decide what the future of AI is…read more here.
Final Thoughts:
The agenticOS marks the moment AI stops waiting for instructions and starts drafting them. That shift is rewriting every chapter of how we build, run, and grow our businesses, including the “miracle metrics” that thrill investors, the messy back-ends that humble engineers, the regulators racing to keep pace, and the job descriptions evolving (and mutating) in real time. We have seen that moon-shots miscarry on dirty data, culture trumps compute in every rollout, and compliance built last-minute is compliance built twice (i.e., measure twice, cut once should be the goal).
Yet we have also seen that firms willing to upskill, embed guardrails, and harvest human judgment can turn the same turbulence into durable advantage.
So here is the line clearly drawn in the sand: in the agentic age, leadership is measured not by how many models you deploy but by how fast your people and processes learn. Treat governance as a product, talent as a living algorithm, and every failure as input to the next iteration. Do that, and you’ll ride the AI wave rather than just follow its motion. Refuse, and the wave will still come, but it will bury your business. The choice is binary and the timeline is now.
Other resources:
2) Join our Community to access support from peers, a message board, and some great VIP content like our agentAcademy, weekly office hours, etc.
3) Join our weekly webinar series, "The Agentic Future with Devin Kearns" every Wednesday from 1-2 PM CST. Subscribe to this calendar for reminders.
4) Follow us on LinkedIn: Ross Green, CAiS, Devin Kearns
5) Want to learn more about how we work (e.g., build-with-you vs. build-for-you; Prebuilt SuperAgents vs, Customized Agents; etc)? Click here to schedule a meeting with us.
6) Have a friend who wants to sign-up for our Newsletter? Click here.
7) Check out Ross Green's Medium Channel
Reply